Complicações pós-operatórias associadas a exenteração pélvica em mulheres com câncer ginecológico: revisão integrativa / Postoperative complications associated with pelvic exenteration in women with gynecological cancer: an integrative review / Complicaciones postoperatorias asociadas a la exenteración pélvica en mujeres con cáncer ginecológico: revisión integradora

RESUMO Objetivo: identificar as principais complicações advindas da cirurgia de exenteração pélvica em câncer ginecológico e o desfecho do óbito hospitalar após o procedimento cirúrgico. Método: revisão integrativa da literatura considerando 23 artigos publicados de 2012 a 2020 nas bases de dados LILACS e IBECS. Os descritores utilizados foram genital cancer, gynecological cancer, pelvic exenteration, exenteration, postoperative complications, surgical complications, death (idioma inglês), combinados através de conectores booleanos AND ou OR. Resultados: constatou-se aplicabilidade cirúrgica para câncer do colo uterino, útero, ovário, vaginal e vulvar; idade associada a comorbidades (diabetes e hipertensão); a exenteração pélvica total predominante; tempo médio de cirurgia e de institucionalização elevados em decorrência de infecções. Considerações finais: a pesquisa possibilita a melhoria da assistência de saúde prestada no pré, peri e pós-operatório de EP enquanto elucida os principais problemas resultantes desta cirurgia, suas estratificações e manejos.

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the main complications arising from the pelvic exenteration surgery in gynecological cancer and the in-hospital death outcome after the surgical procedure. Method: an integrative literature review considering 23 articles published from 2012 to 2020 in the LILACS and IBECS databases. The descriptors used were the following: genital cancer, gynecological cancer, pelvic exenteration, exenteration, postoperative complications, surgical complications and death, combined by means of the AND or OR Boolean connectors. Results: surgical applicability was verified for cervical, uterine, ovarian, vaginal and vulvar cancer; age was associated with comorbidities (diabetes and hypertension); total pelvic exenteration was predominant; and there were high mean surgical and hospitalization times due to infections. Contributions to the area: this research enables improvements in the health care provided in the PE pre-, peri- and post-operative periods, as it elucidates the main problems resulting from this surgery, their stratifications and management options.

RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar las principales complicaciones derivadas de la cirugía de exenteración pélvica en tumores ginecológicos y el desenlace de fallecimiento intrahospitalario después del procedimiento quirúrgico. Método: revisión integradora de la literatura en la que se consideraron 23 artículos publicados en las bases de datos LILACS e IBECS entre 2012 y 2020. Se utilizaron los siguientes descriptores: genital cancer, gynecological cancer, pelvic exenteration, exenteration, postoperative complications, surgical complications y death (idioma inglés), combinados por medio de conectores booleanos AND u OR. Resultados: se detectó lo siguiente: aplicabilidad quirúrgica para cáncer de cuello uterino, útero, ovario, vagina y vulva; edad asociada a comorbilidades (diabetes e hipertensión); predominio de exenteración pélvica total; elevado tiempo promedio de cirugía; e internación por infecciones. Aportes al área: este trabajo de investigación permite mejorar la atención de la salud provista en los períodos pre-, peri- y post-operatorios de la EP, puesto que deja en claro los principales problemas derivados de esta cirugía, sus estratificaciones y opciones de manejo.

Sobrevida após exenteração pélvica em câncer de colo de útero recidivado: uma série de cinco casos / Survival after pelvic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer: a series of five cases

A exenteração pélvica pode curar pacientes com câncer de colo do útero com recorrência central após radioterapia e quimioterapia. A avaliação pré-operatória é essencial para excluir doença metastática e evitar cirurgias desnecessárias nesse cenário. O objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar a sobrevida de uma série de casos de pacientes submetidas à exenteração pélvica em clínica privada de Teresina. Este é o resultado parcial de um estudo observacional, retrospectivo, transversal e descritivo, realizado em uma clínica privada especializada no tratamento do câncer em Teresina, PI, Brasil, de junho de 2002 a fevereiro de 2020. Cinco pacientes foram incluídas no estudo, com idades entre 29 e 62 anos. No presente estudo, a sobrevida mediana foi de 44,8 meses. Duas pacientes estão vivas e sem doença com seguimento de 201 e 5 meses, respectivamente.(AU)

Pelvic exenteration can heal patients with cervical cancer with central recurrence after radiotherapy and / or chemotherapy. Preoperative evaluation is essential to exclude metastatic disease and to avoid unnecessary surgery in this scenario. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the survival of a series of cases of patients submitted to pelvic exenteration in a private clinic in Teresina. This is the partial result of an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study, conducted at a private clinic specialized in cancer treatment in Teresina, Brazil, from June 2002 to February 2020. Five patients were included in the study, aged between 29 and 62 years. In the present study, the median survival was 44,8 months. Two patients are alive and without disease with a follow-up of 201 and 5 months, respectively.(AU)

Double barreled wet colostomy. Case report and description of the surgical technique / Colostomia úmida em dupla-boca. Relato de caso e descrição da técnicacirúrgica

ABSTRACT Pelvic exenteration has showed to be beneficial therapeutically and palliatively in locally advanced colorectal cancer. Reconstruction of urinary transit posterior to a cystectomy has always been challenging with many associated complications. We present a 58-year-old male with locally advanced rectal cancer in which a pelvic exenteration and a double-barreled wet colostomy (DBWC) was created for urinary reconstitution. We present the surgical technique of DBWC. DBWC is a good alternative to other urinary reconstructions because fecal and urinary derivation occurs in only one stoma, the stoma output is easier to manage, and fewer complications are seen compared to other urinary reconstructions. Long-term surveillance is mandatory in patients with a DBWC because there is an increased risk of neoplasm in the reservoir.

RESUMO A exenteração pélvica mostrou-se benéfica, tanto terapêutica quanto paliativamente, em casos de câncer colorretal localmente avançado. A reconstrução do trânsito urinário após uma cistectomia sempre foi desafiadora, com muitas complicações associadas. Os autores apresentam o caso de um homem de 58 anos de idade com câncer retal localmente avançado, submetido a uma exenteração pélvica e uma colostomia úmida em dupla-boca (CUDB) para reconstituição urinária. Os autores apresentam a técnica cirúrgica da CUDB, uma boa alternativa para outras reconstruções urinárias, já que a derivação fecal e urinária ocorre em apenas um estoma, a saída do estoma é mais fácil de gerenciar e o método apresenta menos complicações em comparação com outras reconstruções urinárias. A vigilância a longo prazo é obrigatória em pacientes com CUDB, pois há um risco aumentado de neoplasia no reservatório.

Análise do manejo cirúrgico de pacientes com câncer cervical recidivado após radioterapia e quimioterapia / Analysis of the surgical management of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy and chemotherapy

RESUMO Objetivos: Analisar os resultados de morbidade e sobrevida após cirurgias curativas e paliativas em pacientes com câncer cervical recidivado após tratamento primário com radioterapia e quimioterapia. Outro objetivo foi avaliar os fatores associados aos procedimentos curativos e não curativos. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva de pacientes submetidos à cirurgias curativas e paliativas, entre janeiro de 2011 a dezembro de 2017, em um centro de alta complexidade em oncolologia. O desfecho da morbidade foi relatado de acordo com a classificação de Clavien-Dindo e a análise de sobrevida foi realizada pelo método de Kaplan-Meir. Para avaliar os fatores associados aos procedimentos, foi realizada análise univariada pelo teste U de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Foram realizadas duas histerectomias radicais, três exenterações pélvicas com intenção curativa e cinco exenterações pélvicas paliativas. No grupo curativo, houve complicações maiores em 40% dos casos, e o tempo mediano de sobrevida foi 16 meses. No grupo paliativo, houve complicações maiores em 60% dos casos, e o tempo mediano de sobrevida foi 5 meses. Estadiamento avançado (p=0,02), sintomas (p=0,04), tamanho do tumor maior que cinco centímetros (p=0,04) e mais de três órgãos envolvidos (p=0,003) foram fatores significativamente associados a cirurgia não curativa. Conclusões: As taxas de morbidade foram maiores no grupo paliativo, e o tempo mediano de sobrevida foi menor no grupo paliativo do que no grupo curativo, entretanto esta diferença na sobrevida não teve significância estatística. Estádio avançado, sintomas, tamanho tumoral e número de órgãos envolvidos são fatores que devem ser levados em consideração na indicação de resgate cirúrgico.

ABSTRACT Objectives: To analyze the results of morbidity and survival after curative and palliative surgery in recurrent cervical cancer patients who underwent chemoradiation as their primary treatment. Another goal was to assess the factors associated with curative and non-curative procedures. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort consisting of patients undergoing surgery curative and palliative from January 2011 to December 2017 at a high complexity oncology center. Outcome of morbidity was reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meir method. To assess the factors associated with the procedures, a univariate analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test was performed. Results: Two radical hysterectomies, three pelvic exenterations with curative intent, and five palliatives pelvic exenterations were performed. In the curative group, there were major complications in 40% of the cases, and the median survival time was 16 months. In the palliative group, there were major complications in 60% of the cases, and the median survival time was 5 months. Advanced staging (p-value= 0.02), symptoms (p-value=0.04), tumor size greater than five centimeters (p-value=0.04), and more than three organs involved (p-value=0.003) were factors significantly associated with non-curative surgery. Conclusions: The morbidity rates of this study were higher in palliative group, and the median survival time was lower in the palliative group than the curative group, but this difference in survival was not statistically significant. Advanced stage, symptoms, tumor size and number of organs involved are factors that should be taken into consideration when indicating surgical salvage.

The influence of surgeon volume on outcomes after pelvic exenteration for a gynecologic cancer / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of surgeon experience on intraoperative, postoperative and long-term outcomes among patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all women who underwent exenteration for a gynecologic malignancy at MD Anderson Cancer Center, between January 1993 and June 2013. A logistic regression was used to model the relationship between surgeon experience (measured as the number of exenteration cases performed by the surgeon prior to a given exenteration) and operative outcomes and postoperative complications. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 167 exenterations were performed by 19 surgeons for cervix (78, 46.7%), vaginal (43, 25.8%), uterine (24, 14.4%), vulvar (14, 8.4%) and other cancer (8, 4.7%). The most common procedure was total pelvic exenteration (69.4%), incontinent urinary diversion (63.5%) and vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous reconstruction (42.5%). Surgical experience was associated with decreased estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), intraoperative transfusion (p = 0.009) and a shorter length of stay (p = 0.03). No difference was noted in the postoperative complication rate (p = 0.12–0.95). More surgeon experience was not associated with overall or disease specific survival: OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97–1.06; p = 0.46) and DSS (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.97–1.04; p = 0.66), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing exenteration by more experienced surgeons had improvement in intraoperative factors such as estimated blood loss, transfusion rates and length of stay. No difference was seen in postoperative complication rates, overall or disease specific survival.

Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent and Persistent Cervical Cancer / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>Background</b>Pelvic exenteration (PE) for primary and recurrent cervical cancer has resulted in favorable survival outcomes, but there are controversies about specific prognosis factors, and up to now, there have been no published reports from China. This study aimed to share our experiences of PE, which were performed in a single institution.</p><p><b>Methods</b>From January 2009 to January 2016, 38 patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer were included in the study, and they were followed up until January 2017. Epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of patients were compared for survival outcomes in univariate and Cox hazard regression analysis.</p><p><b>Results</b>There were thirty-one and seven patients with recurrent and persistent cervical cancer, respectively. The median age of patients was 45 years (range 29-65 years). Total, anterior, and posterior PE consisted of 52.6%, 28.9%, and 18.4% of cases, respectively. Early and late complications occurred in 21 (55.3%) patients and 15 (39.5%) patients, respectively. Two (5.3%) patients died due to complications related to surgeries within 3 months after PE. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 28.5 months (range 9-96 months) and 23 months (range 4-96 months), respectively, and 5-year OS and DFS were 48% and 40%, respectively. Cox hazard regression analysis showed that, the margin status of the incision and mesorectal lymph node status were independent risk factors for OS and DFS.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b>In our patients with recurrent and persistent cervical cancer, the practice of PE might achieve favorable survival outcomes.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03291275; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03291275?term=NCT03291275&rank=1.</p>

Pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent malignancies in urology department / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective The objectives of present study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of pelvic exenteration (PE) for the treatment of pelvic malignancies in urology department.Methods From April 2010 to December 2014,20 patients with primary or recurrent pelvic malignancy accepted anterior pelvic exenteration (APE) or total pelvic exenteration (TPE) surgery,including 7 males and 13 females,ranged from 35 to 87 years old with an average of 65 years old.Ten case accepted APE and 10 for TPE.The ilium conduit was done in 5 cases for APE and 6 cases for TPE as urinary diversion,cutaneous ureterostomy was done in 5 cases for APE and 4 cases for TPE as urinary diversion.There were 6 cases primary tumor in APE group and 3 primary tumors in TPE.All of the patients had 13 cases of the urinary tract tumor group,and none of the urinary tract tumor group in 7 cases.There were 4 cases received preoperative chemotherapy in the urinary tract tumor group.No case received preoperative radiotherapy.3 cases received preoperative chemotherapy in none of the urinary tract tumor group,3 cased received preoperative radiotherapy.After induction of general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask for airway management.All patients took the abdominal incision,then dissected lymph nodes on both sides of the iliac vessels,freed bilateral ureters to the end of the swollen bladder,separated the peritoneal space.The bilateral vas deferens was cutted and ligated,then isolated and ligated the seminal vesicles between the posterior wall of the bladder and the anterior wall of the rectum.Lateral ligaments of bladder was cuted,then cuted ligament of prostate and puboprostatic ligament,sutured and cut deep vein of penis.Urethra of apex prostate was freed and cuted.Female patients needed to free the uterus and the posterior wall,cut the cardinal ligament and round ligament of uterus,isolate the posterior wall of the uterus to the posterior vaginal wall.Rectal resection adopted Miles operation.And sigmoid colostomy was performed on the left side of the abdominal wall.The perioperative characters,pathological results and patients' survival data were collected and analyzed.Results The average operation time for APE was 3.8 hours and 5.2 hours for TPE (P =0.173).Median length of hospital stay was 17.9 (7-47) days.The median blood loss was 300ml (80-2 500 ml) for APE and 400ml (50-6 000 ml) for TPE (P =0.909).The median follow-up time was 12.5 months (1-41months).The estimated 2-year survival rate for APE was 55.6％ and 45.0％ for TPE (P =0.642).Urinary system tumors group and non urinary system tumors group were analyzed and compared,The median survival time was 28 months and 13 months (P =0.538) in the two groups.The incidence of gastrointestinal complications of urinary system tumors and non-urinary system tumors was 7.7％ and 28.6％,incision complications was 7.7％ and 28.6％.Complications of urinary diversion only occurred in the non urologic tumor group,the incidence was 14.3％.The incidence of transfusion in two groups was 46.2％ and 28.6％.Conclusions Pelvic exenteration (APE and TPE) could be a safe and reliable choice for local advanced primary and recurrent pelvic malignancy.Even for the recurrent malignancies,the survival results of the patients were satisfactory.

Exenteración pélvica total por cáncer primario del recto: resultados inmediatos y alejados / Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal tumors: experience in 10 patients

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es mostrar los resultados inmediatos y alejados de la exenteración pélvica total (EPT) en el manejo de tumores primarios de recto localmente avanzados. Se describe una alternativa técnica en los casos de EPT supraelevador. La EPT puede ser la única oportunidad de curación en pacientes con tumores pélvicos de gran volumen. Material y método: Se incluyen tumores T4 por la estadificación clínica o los hallazgos operatorios sometidos a una EPT con intención curativa. Resultados: En un periodo de 16 años se intervienen con esta técnica 10 pacientes, 6 de los cuales recibieron radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante. La técnica clásica se empleó en 3 pacientes y la EPT supraelevador, en 6. El promedio de hospitalización fue de 36 días (rango, 18-97) y la morbilidad alcanzó el 80%. El estudio de la pieza operatoria confirmó un tumor T4 en 6 pacientes, T3 en 3 y T0 en uno. Los 6 pacientes con neoadyuvancia son 1 ypT0N0M0, 2 ypIIA, 2 ypIIC y 1 ypIIIB. El resto eran 2 pIIC y 2 pIIIC. En el seguimiento hay 5 pacientes vivos entre 30 y 180 meses, y 3 fallecen por metástasis a distancia sin recidiva local. Conclusión: La EPT es una intervención asociada a una elevada morbilidad y larga estadía hospitalaria. La EPT supraelevador protegida mediante una ileostomía transitoria evitó una colostomía definitiva en 6 de 10 casos. La ileostomía urinaria muestra resultados funcionales satisfactorios en el largo plazo. La sobrevida prolongada en la mitad de los pacientes justifica la indicación de la técnica en casos seleccionados.

Aim: To report the results of total pelvic exenteration (TPE) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal tumors. Material and method: We report 10 patients with stage 4 rectal tumors subjected to a potentially curative TPE in a period of 16 years. Results: Six patients received also adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. A classic technique was used in 3 patients and a supra-elevator technique in 6. Mean hospitalization length was 36 days, and 80% of patients had complications. The pathological study of the surgical piece confirmed a T4 tumor in 6 patients, T3 in 3 and T0 in one. Among patients who received chemoradiotherapy, one was in stage ypT0N0M0, 2 in ypIIA, 2 in ypIIC, one in ypIIIB, 2 in pIIC and 2 in pIIIC. During follow up 3 patients survived between 30 and 180 months and three died due to distant metastases without local relapse. Conclusion: TPE requires long hospital stays and has a high rate of complications. Supra-elevator TPE protected with a transitory ileostomy avoided definitive colostomy in 6 of 10 cases. Urinary ileostomy had satisfactory long term functional results. The prolonged survival of half of the patients justifies the use of this surgical technique.

Extended pelvic resections for the treatment of locally advanced and recurrent anal canal and colorectal cancer: technical aspects and morbimortality predictors aftet 24 consecutive cases / Ressecções pélvicas alargadas no tratamento do câncer colorretal e de canal anal localmente avançado ou recidivado: análise dos aspectos técnicos e fatores de morbimortalidade em 24 casos consecutivos

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the profile of morbidity and mortality and its predictors related to extensive pelvic resections, including pelvic exenteration, to optimize the selection of patients and achieve better surgical results. Methods: we performed 24 major resections for anorectal pelvic malignancy from 2008 to 2015 in the Instituto do Câncer do Ceará. The factors analyzed included age, weight loss, resected organs, total versus posterior exenteration, angiolymphatic and perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis and overall and disease-free survival. Results: the median age was 57 years and the mean follow-up was ten months. Overall morbidity was 45.8%, with five (20.8%) serious complications. There were no deaths in the first 30 postoperative days. The median overall survival was 39.5 months, and disease-free survival, 30.7 months. Concomitant resection of the bladder was an isolated prognostic factor for higher risk of complications (87.5% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.009). Angiolymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis did not reach significance with respect to disease-free survival. Conclusion: treatment of advanced anorectal tumors is challenging, often requiring combined resections, such as cystectomy and sacrectomy, and complex reconstructions. The magnitude of the operation still carries a high morbidity rate, but is a procedure considered safe and feasible, with a low mortality and adequate locoregional tumor control when performed in referral centers.

RESUMO Objetivos: avaliar o perfil de morbimortalidade e seus fatores preditivos relacionados às ressecções pélvicas extensas, incluindo a exenteração pélvica, com o intuito de otimizar a seleção dos pacientes e obtenção de melhores resultados cirúrgicos. Métodos: foram realizadas 24 grandes ressecções pélvicas por neoplasia maligna anorretal de 2008 a 2015 no Instituto do Câncer do Ceará. Os fatores analisados incluíram idade, perda de peso, órgão ressecados, exenteração total versus posterior, invasão angiolinfática e perineural, metástase linfonodal e sobrevida global e livre de doença. Resultados: a mediana de idade foi 57 anos e o tempo médio de seguimento foi dez meses. A morbidade global foi 45,8%, com cinco (20,8%) complicações graves. Não houve óbito nos primeiros 30 dias de pós-operatório. A sobrevida global média foi 39,5 meses e a sobrevida livre de doença foi 30,7 meses. A ressecção concomitante da bexiga foi fator prognóstico isolado com maior risco para complicações (87,5% vs. 26,7%, p=0.009). Invasão angiolinfática e metástase linfonodal não alcançaram significância com relação à sobrevida livre de doença. Conclusão: o tratamento dos tumores anorretais avançados é desafiador, necessitando frequentemente de ressecções combinadas, como a cistectomia e sacrectomia, além de reconstruções complexas. A magnitude da cirurgia ainda carrega uma elevada taxa de morbidade, porém é um procedimento considerado seguro e factível, com uma baixa mortalidade e adequado controle locorregional tumoral quando realizado em centros de referência.

Resección abdominoperineal isquioanal con reconstrucción de pared posterior de vagina con colgajo miocutáneo de músculo recto abdominal vertical / Ischioanal abdominoperineal resection with reconstruction of posterior wall of vagina with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap

El colgajo del recto abdominal miocutáneo vertical, es un excelente colgajo que rellena el gran defecto en la pelvis luego de una resección abdominoperineal isquioanal, siendo libre de tensión y reduciendo significativamente la incidencia de complicaciones de la herida perineal y la estancia hospitalaria, con el cual se puede reconstruir la pared posterior de la vagina. Se reporta aquí el primer caso en Costa Rica de una resección abdominoperineal isquioanal, con reconstrucción de pared posterior de vagina con colgajo del recto abdominal miocutáneo vertical, practicada con éxito en una paciente de 62 años, con un adenocarcinoma rectal localmente avanzado con infiltración de pared posterior de vagina.

Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, is an excellent flap that fills the large defect in the pelvis after an adominoperineal ischioanal resection; it is free from tension, significantly reduces the incidence of perineal wound complications and hospital stay and can be used to reconstruct the posterior wall of the vagina. We report the first case of Costa Rica abdominoperineal ischioanal resection with reconstruction of posterior vaginal wall with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, successfully practiced in a patient of 62 years with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma infiltrating posterior wall of the vagina.

Cervical cancer: what's new? / Câncer de colo do útero: o que há de novo?

SUMMARY Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in Brazil. Among women, it is the second most frequent, second only to breast cancer. It is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the country, with estimated 15,590 new cases (2014) and 5,430 deaths (2013). In order to update information to improve outcomes, reduce morbidity and optimize the treatment of this cancer, this article will address the advancement of knowledge on cervical cancer. The topics covered include the role of surgery in different stages, treatment of locally advanced carcinomas, fertility preservation, the role of the sentinel lymph node technique, indications and techniques of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and some special situations.

RESUMO O câncer de colo uterino é o câncer ginecológico mais frequente em nosso meio. Entre as mulheres, é o segundo mais frequente, atrás apenas do câncer de mama. É a quarta causa de morte por câncer no Brasil, com estimativa de 15.590 casos novos (2014) e com 5.430 mortes (2013). No intuito de atualizar informações para a melhora do prognóstico, redução da morbidade e otimização do tratamento dessa neoplasia, serão abordados neste artigo os avanços nos conhecimentos sobre o câncer cervical. Entre os temas apresentados, estão o papel da cirurgia nos diferentes estádios, o tratamento dos carcinomas localmente avançados, a preservação da fertilidade, o papel da técnica do linfonodo sentinela, indicações e técnicas da radio e quimioterapia, além de situações especiais.

Surgical technique of en bloc pelvic resection for advanced ovarian cancer / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to describe the operative details for en bloc removal of the adnexal tumor, uterus, pelvic peritoneum, and rectosigmoid colon with colorectal anastomosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients with widespread pelvic involvement. METHODS: The patient presented with good performance status and huge pelvic tumor extensively infiltrating into adjacent pelvic organs and obliterating the cul-de-sac. The patient underwent en bloc pelvic resection as primary cytoreductive surgery. En bloc pelvic resection procedure is initiated by carrying a circumscribing peritoneal incision to include all pan-pelvic disease within this incision. After retroperitoneal pelvic dissection, the round ligaments and infundibulopelvic ligaments are divided. The ureters are dissected and mobilized from the peritoneum. After dissecting off the anterior pelvic peritoneum overlying the bladder with its tumor nodules, the bladder is mobilized caudally and the vesicovaginal space is developed. The uterine vessels are divided at the level of the ureters, and the paracervical tissues (or parametria) are divided. The proximal sigmoid colon is divided above the most proximal extent of gross tumor using a ligating and dividing stapling device. The sigmoid mesentery is ligated and divided including the superior rectal vessels. The pararectal and retrorectal spaces are further developed and dissected down to the level of the pelvic floor. The posterior dissection is progressed and moves to the right and then to the left of the rectum. The rectal pillars including the middle rectal vessels are ligated and divided. Hysterectomy is completed in a retrograde fashion. The distal rectum is divided using a linear stapler. The specimen is removed en bloc with the uterus, adnexa, pelvic peritoneum, rectosigmoid colon, and tumor masses leaving a macroscopically tumor-free pelvis. Colorectal anastomosis was completed using stapling device. RESULTS: En bloc pelvic resection was performed by total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic peritonectomy, and rectosigmoid colectomy with colorectal anastomosis using a stapling device. Complete clearance of pelvic disease leaving no gross residual disease was possible using en bloc pelvic resection. CONCLUSION: En bloc pelvic resection is effective for achieving maximal cytoreduction with the elimination of the pelvic disease in advanced primary ovarian cancer patients with extensive pelvic organ involvement.

Outcomes of pelvic exenteration for recurrent or primary locally advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of pelvic exenteration for patients with primary locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACRC) or locally recurrent colorectal cancer (LRCRC), and to identify clinically relevant prognostic factors. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2010, 40 consecutive patients with primary LACRC or LRCRC underwent pelvic exenteration at the National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years and the median follow-up time was 26 months (range, 1-117 months). The overall complication and in-hospital mortality rates were 70% (28/40) and 7.5% (3/40), respectively. The complication rates were similar between patients with primary LACRC (69.6%) and those with LRCRC (70.6%). The overall recurrence rate was 50% (17/34), and was lower in patients with primary LACRC than in patients with LRCRC (33.3% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.032). The 5-year overall survival was significantly different between primary LACRC and patients with LRCRC (58.7% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis revealed that radicality (R0 vs. R1/R2) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The complication and operative mortality rates of pelvic exenteration remained high, but pelvic exenteration might provide an opportunity for long-term survival and good local control. Complete (R0) resection was the only independent prognostic factor for overall survival.

Colovesical Fistula: Should It Be Considered a Single Disease?

PURPOSE: This research was conducted to compare the management and the outcome of patients with colovesical fistulae of different aetiologies. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 2002 to 2012 and analyzed with SPSS ver. 17. Age, gender, aetiology, management, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality were studied and compared among colovesical fistulae of different aetiologies. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients, 46 males (84%) and 9 females (16%), with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 48-75 years) were studied. Diverticular disease was the most common benign cause and recto-sigmoid cancer the most common malignancy. Anterior resection and bladder repair were the most frequent operations in benign cases, as was total pelvic exenteration in the malignant group. Multiple intestinal loop involvement and subsequent resection were significantly higher in those with Crohn disease than it was in patients of colovesical fistula due to all other causes collectively (60% vs. 6%, P = 0.006). Patients with malignancy had a higher postoperative complication rate than patients who did not (12 [80%] vs. 7 [32%], P = 0.0005). Pelvic collection (11, 22%) was the most frequent early complication (predominantly in the malignant group) whereas incisional hernia (8, 22%) was the most common late complication, with a predominance in the benign group. The median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in the malignant group (32 days; IQR, 17-70 days vs. 16 days; IQR, 11-25 days; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite their having similar clinical presentation, colovesical fistulae of various aetiologies differ significantly in management and outcome.

Indicações e complicações da exenteração pélvica no câncer ginecológico / Indications and complications of pelvic exenteration in gynecological cancer

Exenteração pélvica é o tratamento cirúrgico radical para diferentes neoplasias pélvicas malignas. Consiste na retirada de todos os órgãos comprometidos pelo câncer, incluindo margens livres de doença. Recidivas ou persistências de tumor maligno na pelve após tratamento radioquimioterápico são a principal indicação, mas pode também ser o tratamento primário do câncer ginecológico localmente avançado. O procedimento apresenta mortalidade perioperatória de 5 a 10% e morbidade média de 50%. As complicações mais relatadas são fístulas intestinais e urinárias, infecções de sítio cirúrgico e fenômenos tromboembólicos. A sobrevida em 5 anos varia de 30 a 70%, com média de 50% nas maiores séries. Os critérios prognósticos mais importantes são, além da ressecção total ?R0? do tumor com margens cirúrgicas livres, a presença de metástases linfonodais, sobretudo extrapélvicas, e o comprometimento de parede pélvica lateral. Idade e índice de massa corpórea não devem ser considerados como fatores de risco isolados. A exenteração pélvica com intuito paliativo, apesar de indicação ainda discutível, pode ser considerada para alívio da sintomatologia local e consequente melhora na qualidade de vida. Portanto, quando realizada em pacientes cuidadosamente selecionadas, em instituições oncológicas com suporte multidisciplinar, pode oferecer controle da neoplasia pélvica em longo prazo.(AU)

Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgical treatment indicated as the treatment various malignant pelvic neoplasms. It consists of the removal of all organs affected by cancer, including diseasefree margins. treatment are the main indications, but it can also be the primary treatment of locally advanced gynecologic cancer. The procedure presents perioperative mortality of 5 to 10% and an average morbidity of 50%. The most commonly reported complications are intestinal and urinary fistulas, surgical site infections and thromboembolic phenomena. The 5-year survival ranges from 30 to 70%, averaging 50% in the larger series. The most important prognostic criteria are, in addition to the total ?R0? resection of the tumor with free surgical margins, the presence of lymph node metastases, especially extrapelvic, and the affection of the lateral pelvic wall. Age and body mass index should not be considered as isolated risk factors. Pelvic exenteration with palliative intent, although still a debatable indication, may be considered for relief of local symptoms and consequent improvement in quality of life. Therefore, when performed in carefully selected patients in oncological institutions with multidisciplinary support, it can provide the control of pelvic neoplasm in the long term.(AU)

Current status and outcomes of pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: a systematic review / 中华妇产科杂志

Objective To evaluate the current status and outcomes of pelvic exenteration (PE) for recurrent cervical cancer.Methods The following electronic databases has been searched on recurrent cervical cancer management and treatment:Chinese Biological Medicine Disk (CBM),PubMed and Cochrane library.All retrieved studies had to fulfill the following inclusion criteria:cohort studies of recurrent cervical cancer,containing information of detailed patient and operation characteristics as well as the survival rate.Only publications in the English literature were included.All eligible literatures between Jan.1990 and Aug.2013 were assessed for quality.Relevant basic characteristics,complications,survival rate and prognostic factors were reviewed.Results There were eight trials involving 607 patients with cervical cancer received PE,including 515 cases with recurrent disease and 92 cases with primary disease.Four hundred and ninety patients had received total pelvic exenteration (TPE) operation,103 underwent anterior pelvic exenteration(APE) and 14 received posterior pelvic exenteration(PPE).The 5-year overall survival rate for recurrent cervical cancer fluctuate from 26.7％ to 56.0％.Complication rates were from 34.3％ to 83.3％ and the mortality rate was 1.2％ (7/607).Among the relevant factors affecting survival time,resection margin status seemed to be the most important.Conclusion Based on this systematic review,PE does help improve the survival of recurrent cervical cancer patients on the basis of strict selection of candidates.

Preoperative Body Mass Index, 30-Day Postoperative Morbidity, Length of Stay and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Recurrent and Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: Malnutrition is associated with an increased risk of developing complications following gastrointestinal surgery, especially following radical surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. This study aims to determine if preoperative body mass index (BMI) is associated with 30-day morbidity, length of hospital stay and/or quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent and locally-advanced rectal cancer prior to a prospective trial. METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery prior to 2008 was performed. Patients were included if they had a documented BMI as well as a QoL measurement (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Colorectal questionnaire). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, with a mean age of 56 years, had preoperative height and weight data, as well as measures of postoperative QoL, and formed the study group. The numbers of patients with recurrent (n = 17) or locally-advanced rectal cancer (n = 14) were similar. The mean length of stay was 21 days while the mean BMI of the patients was 24.3 (+/- 5.9) kg/m2. The majority of the patients were either of normal weight (n = 15) or overweight/obese (n = 11). The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who were underweight compared to those who were of normal weight (F = 6.508, P = 0.006) and those who were overweight and obese (F = 6.508, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a lower body mass index preoperatively is associated with a longer length of hospital stay. BMI is not associated with long-term QoL in this patient group. However, further prospective research is required.

Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration

BACKGROUND: Perineal reconstruction following pelvic exenteration is a challenging area in plastic surgery. Its advantages include preventing complications by obliterating the pelvic dead space and minimizing the scar by using the previous abdominal incision and a vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap. However, only a few studies have compared the complications and the outcomes following pelvic exenteration between cases with and without a VRAM flap. In this study, we aimed to compare the complications and the outcomes following pelvic exenteration with or without VRAM flap coverage. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of nine patients for whom transpelvic VRAM flaps were created following pelvic exenteration due to pelvic malignancy. The complications and outcomes in these patients were compared with those of another nine patients who did not undergo such reconstruction. RESULTS: Flap reconstruction was successful in eight cases, with minor complications such as wound infection and dehiscence. In all cases in the reconstructed group (n=9), structural integrity was maintained and major complications including bowel obstruction and infection were prevented by obliterating the pelvic dead space. In contrast, in the control group (n=9), peritonitis and bowel obstruction occurred in 1 case (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possibility of flap failure and minor complications, a VRAM flap can result in adequate perineal reconstruction to prevent major complications of pelvic exenteration.